Joe Biden Addresses Special Counsel Report and Age Concerns

Hey, buddy.

Good evening, Mr. President.

Let me say a few things before I take your questions. As you know, the special counsel released his findings today about their look into my handling of classified documents. I was pleased to see he reached the firm conclusion that no charges should be brought against me in this case. This was an exhaustive investigation going back more than 40 years, even into the 1970s when I was still a new United States senator. And the special counsel acknowledged I cooperated completely. I did not throw up any roadblocks. I sought no delays. In fact, I was so determined to give the special counsel what he needed I went forward with a five-hour in-person interview over two days, on October the 8th and 9th of last year, even though Israel had just been attacked by Hamas on the 7th and I was very occupied. I was in the middle of handling an international crisis. (01:03) I was especially pleased to see special counsel make clear the stark distinction and difference between this case and Mr. Trump's case. Special counsel wrote, and I quote, "Several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear." Continuing to quote. "Most notably, after giving multiple chances to return classified documents to avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, we wanted to say Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations, including his home, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation." (01:56) I've seen the headlines since the report was released about my willful retention of documents. These assertions are not only misleading, they're just plain wrong. On page 215, if you had a chance -- I know it's a thick document -- on page 215, the report of the special counsel found the exact opposite. Here's what he wrote. There is in fact a shortage of evidence that I willfully retained classified materials related to Afghanistan. On page 12, the special counsel also wrote for another documents, "The decision to decline criminal charges was straightforward. The evidence suggests that Mr. Biden did not willfully retain these documents." The evidence said I did not willfully retain these documents. In addition, I know there's some attention paid to some language in the report about my recollection of events. There's even reference that I don't remember when my son died. How in the hell dare he raise that? Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself, it wasn't any of their damn business. (03:02) Let me tell you something. Some of you have commented, I wear since the day he died, every single day, the rosary he got from Our Lady of... Every Memorial Day we hold a service remembering him, attended by friends and family and the people who loved him. I don't need anyone to remind me when he passed away or if he passed away. Simple truth is I sat for a five-hour interview over two days of events going back 40 years at the same time I was managing an international crisis. Their task was to make a decision about whether to move forward with charges in this case. That's their decision to make, that's the counsel's decision to make. That's his job. And they decided not to move forward. For any extraneous commentary, they don't know what they're talking about. It has no place in this report. The bottom line is the matter is now closed. I'm going to continue what I've always focused on, my job of being President of the United States of America. Thank you, and I'll take some questions.

President Biden, something the special counsel said in his report is that one of the reasons you were not charged is because, in his description, you are a "well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory."

I'm well-meaning and I'm an elderly man and I know what the hell I'm doing. I've been president and I put this country back on its feet. I don't need his recommendation. It's totally-

How bad is your memory and can you continue as president?

My memory is so bad I let you speak. That's what-

[inaudible 00:04:44] memory has gotten worse, Mr. President?

Now, look. My memory is fine. Take a look at what I've done since I've become president. None of you thought I could pass any of the things I got passed. "How'd that happen?" I guess I just forgot what was going on.

Mr. President, voters have concerns about your age. How are you going to assuage them, and do you fear that this report is only going to fuel further concerns about your age?

Only by some of you.

You were cleared of criminal liability today, Mr. President. Do you take responsibility for at least being careless with classified material?

I take responsibility for not having seen exactly what my staff was doing. [inaudible 00:05:26]. Things that appeared in my garage, things that came out of my home, things that were moved, not by me, but my staff, but my staff.

Mr. President, for months, when you were asked about your age, you would respond with the words, "Watch me."

Watch me.

Then the American people have been watching and they have expressed concerns about your age.

That is your judgment. That is your judgment.

This is according to public polling.

That is not the judgment of the press.

They express concerns about your mental acuity. They say that you are too old. Mr. President, in December, you told me that you believe there are many other Democrats who could defeat Donald Trump. So why does it have to be you now? What is your answer to that question?

Because I'm the most qualified person in this country to be President of the United States and finish the job I started.

Mr. President, why are you confusing the names of world leaders?

I did not share classified information. I did not share it.

With your ghostwriter.

With my ghostwriter. I did not. Guarantee you I did not.

The special counsel said-

Well, no, they did not say that. He did not say that. Let me answer your question. The fact of the matter is what I didn't want repeated, I didn't want him to know and I didn't read it to him, was I had written a long memorandum to President Obama, why we should not be in Afghanistan. And it was multiple pages. And so what I was referring to, I said classified, I should have said it should be private because it was a contact between the president and the vice president as to what was going on. That's what he's referring to. It was not classified information in that document. That was not classified.

When you look back at this incident, is there anything you would do differently now, and do you think that a special prosecutor should have been appointed in the first place in both of these cases?

First of all, what I would have done is oversee the transfer of the material that was in my offices. I should have done that. If I go back, I didn't have the responsibility to that. That was my staff was supposed to do that, and they referenced that in the report. And my staff did not do it in the way that... For example, I didn't know how half the boxes got in my garage until I found out staff gathered them up, put them together, and took them to the garage in my home. And all the stuff that was in my home was in filing cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked. (08:09) It was in my house. It wasn't out, like in Mar-a-Lago, in a public place. And none of it was high classified. Didn't have any of that red stuff on it -- you know what I mean? -- around the corners. None of that. And so I wish I had paid more attention to how the documents were being moved and where. I thought they were being moved to the Archives. I thought all of it was being moved. That's what I thought. Now, what was the last part of your question?

Whether a special counsel should have been appointed in this case and in the case of your rival, former president Trump?

I think a special counsel should have been appointed. And the reason I think a special counsel should have been appointed is because I did not want to be in a position that they looked at Trump and weren't going to look at me, just like they looked at the vice president. And the fact is, they made a firm conclusion. I did not break the law. Period. Thank you all very, very much.

Netanyahu says that he has ordered the IDF- (09:07) [inaudible 00:09:13] hostage negotiation look?

I'm of the view, as you know, that the conduct of the response in the Gaza Strip has been over the top. I think that, as you know, initially, the president of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in. I talked to him. I convinced him to open the gate. I talked to Bibi to open the gate on the Israeli side. I've been pushing really hard, really hard, to get humanitarian assistance into Gaza. There are a lot of innocent people who are starving, a lot of innocent people who are in trouble and dying. And it's got to stop, number one. Number two, I was also in the position that I'm the guy that made the case that we have to do much more to increase the amount of material going in, including fuel, including other items. (10:27) I've been on the phone with the Qataris, I've been on the phone with the Egyptians, I've been on the phone with the Saudis to get as much aid as we possibly can into Gaza. There are innocent people, innocent women and children, who are also badly in need of help. And so that's what we're pushing, and I'm pushing very hard now to deal with this hostage ceasefire. I've been working tirelessly on this deal -- how can I say this without revealing it? -- to lead to a sustained pause in the fighting, in the actions taking place in the Gaza Strip. Because I think if we could get the delay, the initial delay, I think that we would be able to extend that so that we could increase the prospect that this fighting in Gaza changes. (11:24) There's also negotiations. You may recall in the very beginning, right before Hamas attacked, I was in contact with the Saudis and others to work out a deal where they would recognize Israel's right to exist. Make them part of the Middle East and recognize them fully in return for certain things that the United States would commit to do. And the commitment that we were proposing to do related to two items; I'm not going to go in detail. But one of them was to deal with the protection against their arch enemy to the northeast. The second one, by providing ammunition and material for them to defend themselves. Coincidentally, that's the timeframe when this broke out. I have no proof what I'm about to say, but it's not unreasonable to suspect that the Hamas understood what was about to take place and wanted to break it up before it happened.